Jump to content

Talk:Getty Center/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 04:25, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I will leave comments in a few days.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 04:25, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

expanded lead paras. Racepacket (talk) 22:52, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
O.K. but "The Center's design included special provisions to possible earthquakes and fires." seems to be ungrammatical. Is something missing after the word to?--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 01:55, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed, thank you.
I would say address concerns regarding.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 03:29, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • refs such as 1983[4]. and west[5][6]. should immediately follow punctuation. - done
  • Richard Meier need only be linked once. In subsequent uses only mention his last name. - done
  • Merge or expand short (one or two line paragraphs). - done
  • "cut 200 staff positions" out of how many? - done
  • Is there a link for the Americans with Disabilities Act, heliport and promontory? What about Old Master painting? - done
  • I don't know what grotto and azaleas are so you might want to link those too. - done
  • An automated three-car, cable-pulled tram takes passengers to and from the museum. should be An automated three-car, cable-pulled tram transports passengers between the museum and X (presumably the parking garage). - done
  • "an outdoor sculpture garden was added on the west side of the central garden" When? - 2007, done
  • Are the Getty Foundation, Getty Research Institute and Getty Conservation Institute in the pavilions or separate structures? If the pavilions note which ones. If separate structure describe physical location in relation to the nearest pavilion. - done
  • What is the Getty Villa? - done
  • Getty Foundation and J. Paul Getty Trust can not stand alone as one-line sections. Merge or expand. - merged
  • Add metric conversion for million gallons. - done --TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 05:21, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • There are a lot of images in the gallery. Why don't we put one image in each section on alternating sides.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 00:57, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Moved two photos. Some are very strange shapes and will be small if we do a 200px thumbnail.
How about switching sides of the first five so that we have strict alternating.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 01:48, 27 November 2010 (UTC) - done[reply]
Is there no picture that could be appropriate in the fire/earthquake section.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 01:58, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I can't find one.
Personally, I would just move File:Aerial Getty Museum.jpg or File:Getty Center 2008.jpg into the earthquake/fire section if not both. Then once you do that since you only have 5 left in the gallery, I would consider using Template:Multiple image just to move the rest of the gallery images into the text.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 03:27, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I used more photos from the Commons and have added a photo to the earthquake section.
I have confirmed all copyrights. I think if you can respond to the two items below, I can promote this.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 20:10, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Observations

Just had a quick look to the article and wish to make few comments and suggestions:

  • The lead could be much improved. As a reader first I would like to know what is the "Getty Center" i.e. why is it called a "center" and what does "Getty" stand for. Instead the lead starts with a statement that this is one of two locations of the Getty Museum. I would suggest to move the enumeration of its components (Museum, Research etc) to the first paragraph. Than explain in the lead as well as in the article why "Getty". There is no link in the whole article to J. Paul Getty. Regarding the size, I agree is notable and should be in the lead but the 1997 $ value is less relevant (and is going to be even less in the future) than physical size, so I would suggest using site and floor areas.
  • The layout is a bit image heavy, and in particular in the gallery many images add little content. I would suggest removing some of the excess images. You can create a well structured gallery in commons, and link directly there instead of linking to commonscat. Also the caption of the first image is excessively long and does not comply with WP:CAPTION.
  • Consistency of units of measurement: "24 acres (97,000 m2) on a 110-acre (0.45 km2) [...] surrounded by 600 acres (2.4 km2)". There is a jump from sqm to sqkm. I would suggest using hectares for the site area in all three cases (i.e. 9.7 ha, 45 ha and 240 ha).
  • The architecture section provides a description of the site organisation and materials, but not much about the architectural expression. It is not even mentioned that the aluminium is white painted (as characteristic to Meier), and how do the facades look like, how does this building fit in Meier's work ?
  • Data: if available, it would be good to know besides the site area what is the total floor area and how much of it is dedicated for different functions (museum, research etc.) Also how many paintings are in the museum's collection, how many are on display?

Hope this is of help. --Elekhh (talk) 02:30, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Getty_Center/GA1&oldid=955630875"